Don’t like it.
I know Atlanta has a big airport and lots of hotels and that’s probably the main reason they chose it.
But if the AFCCG had been in any of the three cities…Buffalo, Cincinnati, or Kansas City, weather would have been involved.
And for me the big deal is not the location but the bye…by not completing the Bills/Bengals game, Buffalo got “punished” because it had that within its control.
They should have just made up that game.
Atlanta will be neutral site for AFCCG
Atlanta will be neutral site for AFCCG
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)
-
Dan Smith--BYU
- Posts: 2951
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:33 am
also Atlanta hosted a bunch of big college games recently
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
Nietzsche
Nietzsche
It's about equidistant from both cities and is about as neutral a site as you'll find.
As much as I love some outdoor January football, this decision makes sense.
As much as I love some outdoor January football, this decision makes sense.
-
Steeldrama
- Posts: 2924
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:44 pm
Geography definitely the answer here
Vegas would be the ideal destination for neutral site game
Atlanta is fine but the area around the Benz is quite desolate
Fire up those Uber accounts
Nick Markakis on Astros: "Every guy over there needs a beating."
