Steelafan77 wrote:If Michael Irvin, Steve Smith, Joe Theismann, Booger McFarland and Ray Lewis were offered analysts gigs why not Ben then? Those I've listed are the worst I've ever seen FYI. I'm sure there were more before them. Just can't come up with the names off the top of my head right now.
Have to respectfully disagree with Micheal Irvin. I enjoy when he analyzes the Steelers. He is real, and let’s you know he only really cares about the Cowboys and WRs, so when he is talking about your team or favorite player it means something. He is funny and obnoxious. He is only good when he is shackled by the serious guys of the NFL. If he is with other guys of his ilk, he just gets too carried away. But I like him in the run up to big games.
Ray Lewis is pretty intense on Inside the NFL. He was just robbed of his education by poverty I would guess or his own bad habits. His vocabulary is probably the shallowest in the NFL broadcast pool. If he had vocabulary, he would probably actually be the most in demand broadcaster due to his intensity and defensive slant. I feel like he will explode sometimes because he can’t articulate his knowledge of the game and defensive philosophies specifically, quickly enough. That actually might be most of his intensity. I love watching Boom and Phil rib him and slap or punch him, and then they quickly recoil in real fear for a few split seconds.
Ben could easily be in the broadcast booth. Someone has to replace Steve Young, Boomer, Phil, the worst ever Fouts, Warner and a few others.